Sunday, March 13, 2011

A 23 /Res 949 -Port Og Refuge

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION

E
IMO

ASSEMBLY A 23/Res.949
23rd session 5 March 2004Agenda item 17 Original: ENGLISH
Resolution A.949(23)
Adopted on 5 December 2003
(Agenda item 17)
GUIDELINES ON PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS 
IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE
THE ASSEMBLY,
RECALLING Article 15(j) of the Convention on the International Maritime Organization
concerning the functions of the Assembly in relation to regulations and guidelines concerning
maritime safety and the prevention and control of marine pollution from ships,
RECALLING ALSO the obligations and procedures for the master to come to the
assistance of persons in distress at sea, established by regulation V/33 of the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended,
RECALLING FURTHER that the International Convention on Maritime Search and
Rescue, 1979, as amended, establishes a comprehensive system for the rescue of persons in
distress at sea which does not address the issue of ships in need of assistance,
CONSCIOUS OF THE POSSIBILITY that ships at sea may find themselves in need of
assistance relating to the safety of life and the protection of the marine environment,
RECOGNIZING the importance of and need for providing guidance for the masters
and/or salvors of ships in need of assistance,
RECOGNIZING ALSO the need to balance both the prerogative of a ship in need of
assistance to seek a place of refuge and the prerogative of a coastal State to protect its coastline,
RECOGNIZING FURTHER that the provision of a common framework to assist coastal
States to determine places of refuge for ships in need of assistance and respond effectively to
requests for such places of refuge would materially enhance maritime safety and the protection of
the marine environment,
HAVING CONSIDERED the recommendations made by the Maritime Safety Committee
at its seventy-sixth and seventy-seventh sessions, by the Marine Environment Protection
Committee at its forty-eighth session, by the Legal Committee at its eighty-seventh session and
by the Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation at its forty-ninth session,
For reasons of economy, this document is printed in a limited number. Delegates are
kindly asked to bring their copies to meetings and not to request additional copies.
I:\ASSEMBLY\23\RES\949.doc


A 23/Res.949 - 2 -

1. ADOPTS the Guidelines on places of refuge for ships in need of assistance, the text of
which is set out in the annex to the present resolution;
2. INVITES Governments to take these Guidelines into account when determining and
responding to requests for places of refuge from ships in need of assistance;
3. REQUESTS the Maritime Safety Committee, the Marine Environment Protection
Committee and the Legal Committee to keep the annexed Guidelines under review and amend
them as appropriate;
4. REQUESTS the Legal Committee to consider, as a matter of priority, the said Guidelines
from its own perspective, including the provision of financial security to cover coastal State
expenses and/or compensation issues, and to take action as it may deem appropriate.
I:\ASSEMBLY\23\RES\949.doc


-3 -
A 23/Res.949
ANNEX
GUIDELINES ON PLACES OF REFUGE FOR SHIPS
IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE

Table of Contents

A 23/Res.949 - 4 -
1 General
Introduction
Objectives of providing a place of refuge
1.1 Where the safety of life is involved, the provisions of the SAR Convention should be
followed. Where a ship is in need of assistance but safety of life is not involved, these guidelines
should be followed.
1.2 The issue of .places of refuge. is not a purely theoretical or doctrinal debate but the
solution to a practical problem: What to do when a ship finds itself in serious difficulty or in need
of assistance without, however, presenting a risk to the safety of life of persons involved. Should
the ship be brought into shelter near the coast or into a port or, conversely, should it be taken out
to sea?
1.3 When a ship has suffered an incident, the best way of preventing damage or pollution
from its progressive deterioration would be to lighten its cargo and bunkers; and to repair the
damage. Such an operation is best carried out in a place of refuge.
1.4 However, to bring such a ship into a place of refuge near a coast may endanger the coastal
State, both economically and from the environmental point of view, and local authorities and
populations may strongly object to the operation.
1.5 While coastal States may be reluctant to accept damaged or disabled ships into their area
of responsibility due primarily to the potential for environmental damage, in fact it is rarely
possible to deal satisfactorily and effectively with a marine casualty in open sea conditions.
1.6 In some circumstances, the longer a damaged ship is forced to remain at the mercy of the
elements in the open sea, the greater the risk of the vessel.s condition deteriorating or the sea,
weather or environmental situation changing and thereby becoming a greater potential hazard.
1.7 Therefore, granting access to a place of refuge could involve a political decision which
can only be taken on a case-by-case basis with due consideration given to the balance between
the advantage for the affected ship and the environment resulting from bringing the ship into a
place of refuge and the risk to the environment resulting from that ship being near the coast.
Background
1.8 There are circumstances under which it may be desirable to carry out a cargo transfer
operation or other operations to prevent or minimize damage or pollution. For this purpose, it
will usually be advantageous to take the ship to a place of refuge.
1.9 Taking such a ship to a place of refuge would also have the advantage of limiting the
extent of coastline threatened by damage or pollution, but the specific area chosen may be more
severely threatened. Consideration must also be given to the possibility of taking the affected
ship to a port or terminal where the transfer or repair work could be done relatively easily. For
this reason the decision on the choice and use of a place of refuge will have to be carefully
considered.
I:\ASSEMBLY\23\RES\949.doc


-5 -
A 23/Res.949
1.10 The use of places of refuge could encounter local opposition and involve political
decisions. The coastal States should recognize that a properly argued technical case, based on a
clear description of the state of the casualty, would be of great value in any negotiations which
may take place.
1.11 At the international level, the Conventions listed in Appendix 1, as may be amended,
constitute, inter alia, the legal context within which coastal States and ships act in the envisaged
circumstances.
Purpose of the Guidelines
1.12 The purpose of these Guidelines is to provide Member Governments, shipmasters,
companies1 (particularly in connection with the ISM Code and procedures arising therefrom),
and salvors with a framework enabling them to respond effectively and in such a way that, in any
given situation, the efforts of the shipmaster and shipping company concerned and the efforts of
the government authorities involved are complementary. In particular, an attempt has been made
to arrive at a common framework for assessing the situation of ships in need of assistance.
1.13 These Guidelines do not address the issue of operations for the rescue of persons at
sea, inasmuch as the practical difficulties that have given rise to the examination of the issue of
places of refuge relate to problems other than those of rescue. Two situations can arise:
-
the ship, according to the master.s assessment, is in need of assistance but not in a
distress situation (about to sink, fire developing, etc.) that requires the evacuation
of those on board; or
-
those on board have already been rescued, with the possible exception of those
who have stayed on board or have been placed on board in an attempt to deal with
the situation of the ship.
1.14 If, however, in an evolving situation, the persons on board find themselves in
distress, the rules applicable to rescue operations under the SAR Convention, the IAMSAR
Manual and documents arising therefrom have priority over the present Guidelines (and
procedures arising herefrom).
1.15 In any case the competent MRCC should be informed about any situation which may
develop into a SAR incident.
1.16 Even though a .rescue. operation, as defined in the International Convention on Maritime
Search and Rescue (SAR) is not the case, the safety of persons must nevertheless be constantly
borne in mind in the application of these Guidelines, particularly in two respects:
-
if the ship poses a risk (explosion, serious pollution, etc.) to the life of persons in
the vicinity (crews of salvage vessels, port workers, inhabitants of the coastal area,
etc.);
-
if persons voluntarily stay (master, etc.) or go (fire-fighters and other experts,
personnel of marine salvage or towage companies, etc.) on board to attempt to
overcome the difficulties experienced by the ship.
1 As defined in the ISM Code.
I:\ASSEMBLY\23\RES\949.doc

A 23/Res.949
- 6 -

No comments:

Post a Comment